Clinically relevant therapeutic approaches against acetaminophen hepatotoxicity and acute liver failure.

Liver injury and acute liver failure caused by an acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is a significant clinical problem in western countries. With the introduction of the mouse model of APAP hepatotoxicity in the 1970 s, fundamental mechanisms of cell death were discovered. This included the recognition that part of the APAP dose is metabolized by cytochrome P450 generating a reactive metabolite that is detoxified by glutathione. After the partial depletion of glutathione, the reactive metabolite will covalently bind to sulfhydryl groups of proteins, which is the initiating event of the toxicity. This insight led to the introduction of N-acetyl-L-cysteine, a glutathione precursor, as antidote against APAP overdose in the clinic. Despite substantial progress in our understanding of the pathomechanisms over the last decades viable new antidotes only emerged recently. This review will discuss the background, mechanisms of action, and the clinical prospects of the existing FDA-approved antidote N-acetylcysteine, of several new drug candidates under clinical development [4-methylpyrazole (fomepizole), calmangafodipir] and examples of additional therapeutic targets (Nrf2 activators) and regeneration promoting agents (thrombopoietin mimetics, adenosine A2B receptor agonists, Wharton's Jelly mesenchymal stem cells). Although there are clear limitations of certain therapeutic approaches, there is reason to be optimistic. The substantial progress in the understanding of the pathophysiology of APAP hepatotoxicity led to the consideration of several drugs for development as clinical antidotes against APAP overdose in recent years. Based on the currently available information, it is likely that this will result in additional drugs that could be used as adjunct treatment for N-acetylcysteine.

Lack of mitochondrial Cyp2E1 drives acetaminophen-induced ER stress-mediated apoptosis in mouse and human kidneys: Inhibition by 4-methylpyrazole but not N-acetylcysteine.

Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose causes liver injury and acute liver failure, as well as acute kidney injury, which is not prevented by the clinical antidote N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC). The absence of therapeutics targeting APAP-induced nephrotoxicity is due to gaps in understanding the mechanisms of renal injury. APAP metabolism through Cyp2E1 drives cell death in both the liver and kidney. We demonstrate that Cyp2E1 is localized to the proximal tubular cells in mouse and human kidneys. Virtually all the Cyp2E1 in kidney cells is in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), not in mitochondria. By contrast, hepatic Cyp2E1 is in both the ER and mitochondria of hepatocytes. Consistent with this subcellular localization, a dose of 600 mg/kg APAP in fasted C57BL/6J mice induced the formation of APAP protein adducts predominantly in mitochondria of hepatocytes, but the ER of the proximal tubular cells of the kidney. We found that reactive metabolite formation triggered ER stress-mediated activation of caspase-12 and apoptotic cell death in the kidney. While co-treatment with 4-methylpyrazole (4MP; fomepizole) or the caspase inhibitor Ac-DEVD-CHO prevented APAP-induced cleavage of procaspase-12 and apoptosis in the kidney, treatment with NAC had no effect. These mechanisms are clinically relevant because 4MP but not NAC also significantly attenuated APAP-induced apoptotic cell death in primary human kidney cells. We conclude that reactive metabolite formation by Cyp2E1 in the ER results in sustained ER stress that causes activation of procaspase-12, triggering apoptosis of proximal tubular cells, and that 4MP but not NAC may be an effective antidote against APAP-induced kidney injury.

Management of Acetaminophen Poisoning in the US and Canada: A Consensus Statement.

Importance: The US and Canada currently have no formal published nationwide guidelines for specialists in poison information or emergency departments for the management of acetaminophen poisoning, resulting in significant variability in management. Objective: To develop consensus guidelines for the management of acetaminophen poisoning in the US and Canada. Evidence Review: Four clinical toxicology societies (America's Poison Centers, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, American College of Medical Toxicology, and Canadian Association of Poison Control Centers) selected participants (n = 21). Led by a nonvoting chairperson using a modified Delphi method, the panel created a decision framework and determined the appropriate clinical management of a patient with acetaminophen poisoning. Unique to this effort was the collection of guidelines from most poison centers in addition to systematic collection and review of the medical literature. Comments from review by external organizations were incorporated before the guideline was finalized. The project began in March 2021 and ended in March 2023. Findings: The search retrieved 84 guidelines and 278 publications. The panel developed guidelines for emergency department management of single or repeated ingestion of acetaminophen. In addition, the panel addressed extended-release formulation, high-risk ingestion, coingestion of anticholinergics or opioids, age younger than 6 years, pregnancy, weight greater than 100 kg, and intravenous acetaminophen use. Differences from current US practice include defining acute ingestion as an ingestion presentation from 4 to 24 hours after overdose was initiated. A revised form of the Rumack-Matthew nomogram was developed. The term massive ingestion was replaced with the term high-risk ingestion and denoted by a specific nomogram line. Other recommendations include specific criteria for emergency department triage, laboratory evaluation and monitoring parameters, defining the role of gastrointestinal decontamination, detailed management of acetylcysteine treatment, associated adverse effects, and stopping criteria for acetylcysteine treatment, as well as criteria for consultation with a clinical toxicologist. Finally, specific treatment considerations, including acetylcysteine dosing, fomepizole administration, and considerations for extracorporeal elimination and transplant evaluation, were addressed. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study provides a consensus statement on consistent evidence-based recommendations for medical, pharmacy, and nursing education and practice to optimize care of patients with acetaminophen poisoning.

Failure of Risk Assessment After Paracetamol Overdose-A Short Communication.

BACKGROUND: The accepted treatment for patients with acetaminophen/paracetamol overdose includes risk assessment based on the Rumack-Matthew (R-M) nomogram. An inaccurate use of the nomogram may result in improper treatment. Clinicians were surveyed to determine their understanding and proper use of this risk assessment tool in practice. METHODS: Differences between visual risk assessment using the same depiction of the R-M nomogram and calculated risk assessment were determined using an online calculator developed based on the Rumack equation. An online survey was administered in French between August 25, 2021, and November 25, 2021, as a Google Form with 14 questions (the paracetamol concentration and time postingestion were stated). A total of 147 respondents with an average age of 32 years (range 23-61 years) performed risk assessment (low/possible/probable/not assessable). The mean assessment accuracy was 66.2 ± 26.7% (12.3-99.3). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 93%, 55%, 71%, and 89%, respectively. A subcohort of n = 31 senior clinicians showed the same trends (91%, 52%, 69%, and 84%). RESULTS: Approximately 7% of patients who are at risk of hepatotoxicity based on the R-M nomogram would not be treated. By contrast, N-acetylcysteine was not recommended by the R-M nomogram but would be administered to approximately 50% of patients. A concern for the latter group is that anaphylactoid reactions occur in up to 25% of patients with low paracetamol concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Some patients may be undertreated, resulting in possible hepatotoxicity, and many patients may be overtreated, resulting in a high percentage of anaphylaxis. Rather than relying on visual risk assessment, physicians should use an online calculator ( www.hopitox.com/?lang=en ) or consult with a toxicologist or poison center to substantially improve patient care after acetaminophen/paracetamol overdose.

Fifty years of paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning: the development of risk assessment and treatment 1973-2023 with particular focus on contributions published from Edinburgh and Denver.

INTRODUCTION: Fifty years ago, basic scientific studies and the availability of assay methods made the assessment of risk in paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning possible. The use of the antidote acetylcysteine linked to new methods of risk assessment transformed the treatment of this poisoning. This review will describe the way in which risk assessment and treatments have developed over the last 50 years and highlight the remaining areas of uncertainty. METHODS: A search of PubMed and its subsidiary databases revealed 1,166 references published in the period 1963-2023 using the combined terms "paracetamol", "poisoning", and "acetylcysteine". Focused searches then identified 170 papers dealing with risk assessment of paracetamol poisoning, 141 with adverse reactions to acetylcysteine and 114 describing different acetylcysteine regimens. To manage the extensive literature, we focused mainly on contributions made by the authors during their time in Edinburgh and Denver. DOSE AND CONCENTRATION RESPONSE: The key relationship between paracetamol dose and toxicity risk was established in 1971 and led to the development of the Rumack-Matthew nomogram from data collected in Edinburgh. MECHANISMS OF TOXICITY: A series of papers on the mechanisms of toxicity were published in 1973, and these showed that paracetamol hepatotoxicity was caused by the formation of a toxic intermediate epoxide metabolite normally detoxified by glutathione but which, in excess, was bound covalently to hepatic enzymes and proteins. An understanding of the relationship between the rate of paracetamol metabolism, paracetamol concentration, and toxic hazard in humans soon followed. ANTIDOTE DEVELOPMENT AND EFFICACY IN PATIENTS: These discoveries were followed by the testing of a range of sulfhydryl-donors in animals and "at risk" patients. Acetylcysteine was developed as the lead intravenous antidote in the United Kingdom. The license holder in the United States refused to make an intravenous formulation. Thus, oral acetylcysteine became the antidote trialed in the United States National Multicenter Study. Intravenous acetylcysteine regimens used initially in the United Kingdom and subsequently in the United States used loading doses of 150 mg/kg over 15 minutes or one hour, 50 mg/kg over four hours, and 100 mg/kg over 16 hours. These regimens were associated with adverse drug reactions (nausea, vomiting and anaphylactoid reactions) and hence, treatment interruption. Newer dosing regimens now give loading doses more slowly. One, the Scottish and Newcastle Anti-emetic Pretreatment protocol, using an acetylcysteine regimen of 100 mg/kg over two hours followed by 200 mg/kg over 10 hours, has been widely adopted in the United Kingdom. A cohort comparison study suggests this regimen has comparable efficacy to standard regimens and offers opportunities for selective higher acetylcysteine dosing. RISK ASSESSMENT AT PRESENTATION: No dose-ranging studies with acetylcysteine were done, and no placebo-controlled studies were performed. Thus, there is uncertainty regarding the optimal dose of acetylcysteine, particularly in patients ingesting very large overdoses of paracetamol. The choice of intervention concentration on the Rumack-Matthew nomogram has important consequences for the proportion of patients treated. The United States National Multicenter Study used a "treatment" line starting at 150 mg/L (992 µmol/L) at 4 hours post overdose, extending to 24 hours with a half-life of 4 hours, now standard there, and subsequently adopted in Australia and New Zealand. In the United Kingdom, the treatment line was initially 200 mg/L (1,323 µmol/L) at 4 hours (the Rumack-Matthew "risk" line). In 2012, the United Kingdom Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency lowered the treatment line to 100 mg/L (662 µmol/L) at 4 hours for all patients, increasing the number of patients admitted and treated at a high cost. Risk assessment is a key issue for ongoing study, particularly following the development of potential new antidotes that may act in those at greatest risk. The development of biomarkers to assess risk is ongoing but has yet to reach clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Even after 50 years, there are still areas of uncertainty. These include appropriate acetylcysteine doses in patients who ingest different paracetamol doses or multiple (staggered) ingestions, early identification of at-risk patients, and optimal treatment of late presenters.

Comparing N-acetylcysteine and 4-methylpyrazole as antidotes for acetaminophen overdose.

Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose can cause hepatotoxicity and even liver failure. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is still the only FDA-approved antidote against APAP overdose 40 years after its introduction. The standard oral or intravenous dosing regimen of NAC is highly effective for patients with moderate overdoses who present within 8 h of APAP ingestion. However, for late-presenting patients or after ingestion of very large overdoses, the efficacy of NAC is diminished. Thus, additional antidotes with an extended therapeutic window may be needed for these patients. Fomepizole (4-methylpyrazole), a clinically approved antidote against methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning, recently emerged as a promising candidate. In animal studies, fomepizole effectively prevented APAP-induced liver injury by inhibiting Cyp2E1 when treated early, and by inhibiting c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and oxidant stress when treated after the metabolism phase. In addition, fomepizole treatment, unlike NAC, prevented APAP-induced kidney damage and promoted hepatic regeneration in mice. These mechanisms of protection (inhibition of Cyp2E1 and JNK) and an extended efficacy compared to NAC could be verified in primary human hepatocytes. Furthermore, the formation of oxidative metabolites was eliminated in healthy volunteers using the established treatment protocol for fomepizole in toxic alcohol and ethylene glycol poisoning. These mechanistic findings, together with the excellent safety profile after methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning and after an APAP overdose, suggest that fomepizole may be a promising antidote against APAP overdose that could be useful as adjunct treatment to NAC. Clinical trials to support this hypothesis are warranted.

Fomepizole as an adjunct in acetylcysteine treated acetaminophen overdose patients: a case series.

INTRODUCTION: Acetaminophen (N-acetyl-para-aminophenol or APAP) is the leading cause of acute liver failure worldwide. Standard therapy for APAP overdose is with IV N-acetylcysteine (NAC). However, overdose patients treated with NAC can still incur hepatotoxicity in some circumstances. Fomepizole has proven safety in methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning and is a potent CYP2E1 and c-Jun-N-terminal Kinase (JNK) inhibitor that is effective even in the metabolic phase. METHODS: We present a prospective case series of 14 consecutive, high-risk patients who had elevated APAP levels after overdose who were treated with fomepizole as an adjunct to standard IV-NAC. The attending toxicologist utilized clinical judgement to determine the use of fomepizole, especially if APAP levels persisted due to altered half-life or risk factors for toxicity. RESULTS: There were no unfavorable outcomes in any patient, which were better than expected. CONCLUSIONS: This case series has demonstrated the safety of fomepizole in high-risk APAP overdose. The efficacy of fomepizole needs to be further elucidated through controlled clinical trials on a larger scale. In massive APAP overdoses, fomepizole should be considered as an adjunct due to the known failure rate of NAC and the safety profile of fomepizole.

Metabolomic markers predictive of hepatic adaptation to therapeutic dosing of acetaminophen.

BACKGROUND: Drug induced liver injury (DILI) remains a prominent global issue and acetaminophen (APAP) overdose represents a common cause of hepatic injury and DILI. Transient alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations have been documented while adhering to recommended daily dosing. However, no metabolites have been identified in pre-treatment samples predicting which patients will develop these transient increases. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of samples collected from a parent study describing the course of ALT levels in subjects receiving therapeutic APAP dosing. Two hundred and four subjects recruited from Denver, Colorado received 4 g APAP/daily for at least 16 days. Subjects were grouped by ALT at any monitored time point above 60 units/L (n = 25) vs. no increase (n = 179). Serum samples from days 0, 7, 16, and 31 were run on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. We report the metabolomic results of samples analyzed prior to APAP administration and over time. Significant changes in metabolite and demographic variable expressions were explored using t-tests with false discovery rate correction, chi square, and partial least squares discriminant analyses. RESULTS: Within pre-treatment day 0 samples, allantoate and ornithine were significantly elevated in subjects of the ALT elevation group (p = .032). Baseline ALT (p = .011) and alkaline phosphatase (p = .006) were also significant. These metabolites were significant independent of race, ethnicity, gender, or BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Allantoate and ornithine are directly involved in pathways related to nitrogen release and urea production. Further investigation into alterations in the glutathione metabolism and urea cycle pathways may lead to a greater understanding of the mechanisms associated with hepatic adaptation for a variety of pharmaceuticals.

Delayed administration of N-acetylcysteine blunts recovery after an acetaminophen overdose unlike 4-methylpyrazole.

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is the only clinically approved antidote against acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity. Despite its efficacy in patients treated early after APAP overdose, NAC has been implicated in impairing liver recovery in mice. More recently, 4-methylpyrazole (4MP, Fomepizole) emerged as a potential antidote in the mouse APAP hepatotoxicity model. The objective of this manuscript was to verify the detrimental effect of NAC and its potential mechanism and assess whether 4MP has the same liability. C57BL/6J mice were treated with 300 mg/kg APAP; 9 h after APAP and every 12 h after that, the animals received either 100 mg/kg NAC or 184.5 mg/kg 4MP. At 24 or 48 h after APAP, parameters of liver injury, mitochondrial biogenesis and cell proliferation were evaluated. Delayed NAC treatment had no effect on APAP-induced liver injury at 24 h but reduced the decline of plasma ALT activities and prevented the shrinkage of the areas of necrosis at 48 h. This effect correlated with down-regulation of key activators of mitochondrial biogenesis (AMPK, PGC-1α, Nrf1/2, TFAM) and reduced expression of Tom 20 (mitochondrial mass) and PCNA (cell proliferation). In contrast, 4MP attenuated liver injury at 24 h and promoted recovery at 48 h, which correlated with enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis and hepatocyte proliferation. In human hepatocytes, 4MP demonstrated higher efficacy in preventing cell death compared to NAC when treated at 18 h after APAP. Thus, due to the wider treatment window and lack of detrimental effects on recovery, it appears that at least in preclinical models, 4MP is superior to NAC as an antidote against APAP overdose.

Predicting mortality from acetaminophen poisoning shortly after hospital presentation.

AIMS: Early identification of patients likely to die after acetaminophen (APAP) poisoning remains challenging. We sought to compare the sensitivity and time to fulfilment (latency) of established prognostic criteria. METHODS: Three physician toxicologists independently classified every in-hospital death associated with APAP overdose from eight large Canadian cities over three decades using the Relative Contribution to Fatality scale from the American Association of Poison Control Centres. The sensitivity and latency were calculated for each of the following criteria: King's College Hospital (KCH), Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) ≥33, lactate ≥3.5 mmol/L, phosphate ≥1.2 mmol/L 48+ hours post-ingestion, as well as combinations thereof. RESULTS: A total of 162 in-hospital deaths were classified with respect to APAP as follows: 26 Undoubtedly, 40 Probably, 27 Contributory, 14 Probably not, 25 Clearly not, and 30 Unknown. Cases from the first three classes (combined into n = 93 "APAP deaths") typically presented with supratherapeutic APAP concentrations, hepatotoxicity, acidaemia, coagulopathy and/or encephalopathy, and began antidotal treatment a median of 12 hours (IQR 3.4-30 h) from the end of ingestion. Among all patients deemed "APAP deaths", meeting either KCH or lactate criteria demonstrated the highest sensitivity (94%; 95% CI 86-98%), and the shortest latency from hospital arrival to criterion fulfilment (median 4.2 h; IQR 1.0-16 h). In comparison, the MELD criterion demonstrated a substantially lower sensitivity (55%; 43-66%) and longer latency (52 h; 4.4-∞ h, where "∞" denotes death prior to criterion becoming positive). CONCLUSIONS: Meeting either KCH or serum lactate criteria identifies most patients who die from acetaminophen poisoning at or shortly after hospital presentation.

The Genomics of Elevated ALT and Adducts in Therapeutic Acetaminophen Treatment: a Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic acetaminophen (APAP) ingestion causes asymptomatic drug-induced liver injury in some patients. In most cases, elevations in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are transient and return to the normal range, even with continued APAP ingestion, though ALT elevation persists in some patients unpredictably. The etiology of this liver injury or adaption is unclear. Our objective was to identify new pharmacogenomic variants associated with elevated ALT or elevated protein adduct concentrations in patients receiving therapeutic acetaminophen. METHODS: We performed genome-wide sequencing analysis on eight patients using leftover blood samples from an observational study that administered four grams of acetaminophen for up to 16 days to all patients. Two patients with ALT elevations > two times the upper limit of normal, two patients with no adduct formation, and four control patients were sequenced. The genomes were aligned with the GRCh38 reference sequence, and variants with predicted low, moderate, or high impact on the subsequent proteins were first manually curated for biologic plausibility, then organized and examined in the REACTOME pathway analysis program. RESULTS: We found 394 variants in 107 genes associated with elevated ALT. Variants associated with ALT elevation predominantly involved genes in the immune system (MHC class II complex genes), endoplasmic reticulum stress response (SEC23B and XBP1), oxidative phosphorylation (NDUFB9), and WNT/beta-catenin signaling (FZD5). Variants associated with elevated adducts were primarily in signal transduction (MUC20) and DNA repair mechanisms (P53). CONCLUSIONS: While underpowered, genetic variants in immune system genes may be associated with drug-induced liver injury at therapeutic doses of acetaminophen.

4-methylpyrazole protects against acetaminophen-induced acute kidney injury.

Acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity is the most common cause of acute liver failure in the United States, and while a significant percentage of APAP overdose patients develop kidney injury, molecular mechanisms involved in APAP-induced nephrotoxicity are relatively unknown. We have shown that 4-methylpyrazole (4MP, Fomepizole) protects against APAP-induced liver injury by inhibiting reactive metabolite formation through Cyp2E1, and analysis of data from APAP overdose patients indicated that kidney dysfunction strongly correlated with severe liver injury. Since Cyp2E1 is also expressed in the kidney, this study explored protection by 4MP against APAP-induced nephrotoxicity. Male C57BL/6 J mice were treated with either 300 or 600 mg/kg APAP with or without 4MP for 2, 6 or 24 h, followed by measurement of APAP metabolism and tissue injury. Interestingly, levels of APAP and its non-oxidative metabolites were significantly higher in kidneys when compared to the liver. APAP-protein adducts were present in both tissues within 2 h, but were absent in kidney mitochondria, unlike in the liver. While GSH depletion was seen in both tissues, activation of c-jun N-terminal kinase and its translocation to the mitochondria, which is a critical feature of APAP-induced liver injury, was not detected in the kidney. Treatment with 4MP attenuated APAP oxidative metabolite generation, GSH depletion as well as kidney injury indicating its potential use in protection against APAP-induced nephrotoxicity. In conclusion, since reactive metabolite formation seems to be common in both liver and kidney, 4MP mediated inhibition of Cyp2E1 protects against APAP-induced nephrotoxicity. However, downstream mechanisms of APAP-induced nephrotoxicity seem distinct from the liver.

The Effect of 4-Methylpyrazole on Oxidative Metabolism of Acetaminophen in Human Volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: Acetaminophen (APAP) is commonly ingested in both accidental and suicidal overdose. Oxidative metabolism by cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) produces the hepatotoxic metabolite, N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine. CYP2E1 inhibition using 4-methylpyrazole (4-MP) has been shown to prevent APAP-induced liver injury in mice and human hepatocytes. This study was conducted to assess the effect of 4-MP on APAP metabolism in humans. METHODS: This crossover trial examined the ability of 4-MP to inhibit CYP2E1 metabolism of APAP in five human volunteers. Participants received a single oral dose of APAP 80 mg/kg, both with and without intravenous 4-MP, after which urinary and plasma oxidative APAP metabolites were measured. The primary outcome was the fraction of ingested APAP excreted as total oxidative metabolites (APAP-CYS, APAP-NAC, APAP-GSH). RESULTS: Compared with APAP alone, co-treatment with 4-MP decreased the percentage of ingested APAP recovered as oxidative metabolites in 24-hour urine from 4.48 to 0.51% (95% CI = 2.31-5.63%, p = 0.003). Plasma concentrations of these oxidative metabolites also decreased. CONCLUSIONS: These results show 4-MP effectively reduced oxidative metabolism of APAP in human volunteers ingesting a supratherapeutic APAP dose. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03878693.

Delayed Treatment With 4-Methylpyrazole Protects Against Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity in Mice by Inhibition of c-Jun n-Terminal Kinase.

Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is the most common cause of hepatotoxicity and acute liver failure in the United States and many western countries. However, the only clinically approved antidote, N-acetylcysteine, has a limited therapeutic window. 4-Methylpyrazole (4MP) is an antidote for methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning, and we have recently shown that cotreatment of 4MP with APAP effectively prevents toxicity by inhibiting Cyp2E1. To evaluate if 4MP can be used therapeutically, C57BL/6J mice were treated with 300 mg/kg APAP followed by 50 mg/kg 4MP 90 min later (after the metabolism phase). In these experiments, 4MP significantly attenuated liver injury at 3, 6, and 24 h after APAP as shown by 80%-90% reduction in plasma alanine aminotransferase activities and reduced areas of necrosis. 4MP prevented c-Jun c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation and its mitochondrial translocation, and reduced mitochondrial oxidant stress and nuclear DNA fragmentation. 4MP also prevented JNK activation in other liver injury models. Molecular docking experiments showed that 4MP can bind to the ATP binding site of JNK. These data suggest that treatment with 4MP after the metabolism phase effectively prevents APAP-induced liver injury in the clinically relevant mouse model in vivo mainly through the inhibition of JNK activation. 4MP, a drug approved for human use, is as effective as N-acetylcysteine or can be even more effective in cases of severe overdoses with prolonged metabolism (600 mg/kg). 4MP acts on alternative therapeutic targets and thus may be a novel approach to treatment of APAP overdose in patients that complements N-acetylcysteine.

Changing nomogram risk zone classification with serial testing after acute acetaminophen overdose: a retrospective database analysis.

CONTEXT: The Rumack-Matthew nomogram stratifies patients into discrete risk zones following acetaminophen (APAP) overdose. Treatment decisions have traditionally been based on the initial risk zone. "Line-crossing" between zones occurs and is poorly understood. The study objective was to characterize line-crossing behavior in acute APAP overdose patients, especially moving from below to above the nomogram treatment threshold. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study was a secondary analysis of the Canadian Acetaminophen Overdose Study (CAOS) database, a large medical record review of patients hospitalized in eight large Canadian cities (1980-2005) following APAP poisoning. Population consisted of acute APAP overdose patients with at least two serum concentrations performed during hospitalization. Using ordinal logistic regression, we studied the effects of patient demographics, ingestion size/timing, APAP concentrations, time to N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and co-ingestants on a three-level dependent variable: patients whose risk increased two or more zones, those remaining in the same or adjacent zone, and those whose risk fell by two or more zones. RESULTS: Of the 3201 eligible hospitalizations with 7705 APAP concentrations, half (1679, 52.5%) crossed at least one zone (up or down) within 24 h of acute ingestion, including 190 (5.9%), who crossed at least two lines into a higher risk zone, and 516 (16.1%) at least two lines into a lower risk zone. Of the 1251 patients initially below the nomogram treatment line of 150 µg/mL, 131 (10.8%) patients crossed above this line. Being older, male, and co-ingesting opioids, antimuscarinics, or NSAIDs were independently associated with line-crossing. CONCLUSIONS: Patients commonly crossed nomogram risk zones, including from below to above the current treatment threshold. These findings support recommendations for serial APAP testing until the individual risk of hepatic injury is clearly established.

Mushroom poisoning: A proposed new clinical classification.

Mushroom poisoning is a significant and increasing form of toxin-induced-disease. Existing classifications of mushroom poisoning do not include more recently described new syndromes of mushroom poisoning and this can impede the diagnostic process. We reviewed the literature on mushroom poisoning, concentrating on the period since the current major classification published in 1994, to identify all new syndromes of poisoning and organise them into a new integrated classification, supported by a new diagnostic algorithm. New syndromes were eligible for inclusion if there was sufficient detail about both causation and clinical descriptions. Criteria included: identity of mushrooms, clinical profile, epidemiology, and the distinctive features of poisoning in comparison with previously documented syndromes. We propose 6 major groups based on key clinical features relevant in distinguishing between poisoning syndromes. Some clinical features, notably gastrointestinal symptoms, are common to many mushroom poisoning syndromes. Group 1 - Cytotoxic mushroom poisoning. Syndromes with specific major internal organ pathology: (Subgroup 1.1; Primary hepatotoxicity); 1A, primary hepatotoxicity (amatoxins); (Subgroup 1.2; Primary nephrotoxicity); 1B, early primary nephrotoxicity (amino hexadienoic acid; AHDA); 1C, delayed primary nephrotoxicity (orellanines). Group 2 - Neurotoxic mushroom poisoning. Syndromes with primary neurotoxicity: 2A, hallucinogenic mushrooms (psilocybins and related toxins); 2B, autonomic-toxicity mushrooms (muscarines); 2C, CNS-toxicity mushrooms (ibotenic acid/muscimol); 2D, morel neurologic syndrome (Morchella spp.). Group 3 - Myotoxic mushroom poisoning. Syndromes with rhabdomyolysis as the primary feature: 3A, rapid onset (Russula spp.); 3B, delayed onset (Tricholoma spp.). Group 4 - Metabolic, endocrine and related toxicity mushroom poisoning. Syndromes with a variety of clinical presentations affecting metabolic and/or endocrine processes: 4A, GABA-blocking mushroom poisoning (gyromitrins); 4B, disulfiram-like (coprines); 4C, polyporic mushroom poisoning (polyporic acid); 4D, trichothecene mushroom poisoning (Podostroma spp.); 4E, hypoglycaemic mushroom poisoning (Trogia venenata); 4F, hyperprocalcitoninemia mushroom poisoning (Boletus satanas); 4G, pancytopenic mushroom poisoning (Ganoderma neojaponicum). Group 5 - Gastrointestinal irritant mushroom poisoning. This group includes a wide variety of mushrooms that cause gastrointestinal effects without causing other clinically significant effects. Group 6 - Miscellaneous adverse reactions to mushrooms. Syndromes which do not fit within the previous 5 groups: 6A, Shiitake mushroom dermatitis; 6B, erythromelagic mushrooms (Clitocybe acromelagia); 6C, Paxillus syndrome (Paxillus involutus); 6D, encephalopathy syndrome (Pleurocybella porrigens).